Jessica Pegula enters her first Grand Slam final. Kim Clijsters has some advice

NEW YORK — “If I had the chance to run away before I walked on court, I probably would have.”

Kim Clijsters is talking about how she felt ahead of her first Grand Slam final at the French Open 23 years ago as she prepared to face Jennifer Capriati. Capriati had won the Australian Open that year in what was also her first Grand Slam final.

On Saturday evening, Jessica Pegula will be fighting back similar feelings as she prepares to compete in her first final — at the U.S. Open, in her home Grand Slam, against Aryna Sabalenka, who has played three major finals already, winning two of them.

Clijsters had only just turned 18 and puts much of the fear she felt down to callowness. Pegula, in tennis terms, is at the opposite end of the spectrum — at 30, she is the oldest first-time Grand Slam finalist since 33-year-old Flavia Pennetta, who beat compatriot Roberta Vinci to win the title in New York in 2015.

Kim Clijsters lost to Jennifer Capriati in her first Grand Slam final. She would win four majors in her career (Clive Brunskill / Allsport)

That may help Pegula, it may hinder her — either way, nothing can fully prepare a player for what it’s like for a first major final.

“There are added nerves, added emotions that you’ve never experienced,” Clijsters said in an interview at Wimbledon.

“It’s the reason I lost my first four Slam finals. I couldn’t handle the pressure of seeing the trophy and thinking this is something I’ve wanted my whole life.”

Clijsters fell to Capriati, as she details, giving the American her second title of 2001.

There is perhaps no better player for Pegula to learn from in this regard. Clijsters retired from tennis in 2007, aged 23, burnt out by competition and having suffered several injuries. When she returned to the sport, the scene of her greatest comeback triumph was the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center as she entered the 2009 U.S. Open as an unranked player and won the whole thing.

Thursday night, Pegula was relaxed about how she would prepare for the biggest match of her life after beating Karolina Muchova in a three-set semifinal that turned on a missed volley from Muchova, who would have gone 6-1, 3-0 up if she had made it. Pegula, world No. 6, was circumspect about whether or not she would tap up players who have been in this position to ask for their advice.

“We’ll see who texts me tonight and tomorrow. Maybe if there is a good name that pops up, I can pick their brain a little bit.

“I might just kind of wing it.”

Although her opponent, Sabalenka, has been here before, she was nervous when losing the first set to Elena Rybakina in last year’s Australian Open final. Eventually, the Belarusian and current world No. 2 settled into the match before coming back to win in three sets. By contrast, Sabalenka looked in control of her first U.S. Open final, when she won the first set 6-2 against Coco Gauff. Instead, she unravelled in the face of Gauff’s resilience and a 24,000-strong home crowd, surrendering a title that she had in her grasp in another three-set final.

There are more nuanced symmetries between the two finalists as well. It took Sabalenka four attempts to win a Grand Slam semifinal, while on Wednesday Pegula won her first major quarterfinal after having lost her first six.

After that kind of breakthrough win, a player often goes one of two ways. They are liberated and able to play free in the next match or a bit less focused after the emotional comedown of finally achieving a goal.

Pegula tracked with the latter for the first set of her semifinal against Muchova, 24 hours after her landmark win against world No. 1 Iga Swiatek.

In her on-court interview, Pegula said Muchova “made me look like a beginner, I was about to burst into tears.”

GO DEEPER

Jessica Pegula beats Karolina Muchova in thriller to reach U.S. Open final

Later on, she suggested she’d actually been too relaxed before playing Muchova, meaning she was missing some of the nervous tension she’d experienced ahead of facing Swiatek.

“It was weird,” Pegula said. “I feel like before the match with Iga, I was way more nervous and today I was just, like, ‘Whatever’.

“Maybe that was bad because I came out super flat. Clearly, I was a little too loose.”

Jessica Pegula has reached her first Grand Slam final in the same tournament as her first Grand Slam semifinal (Getty Images)

It’s a fine balance to strike. Sabalenka has often gone too far the other way — in last year’s final against Gauff, she was clearly stressed out by the patriotic crowd. She looked similarly wound up towards the end of the second set in Thursday’s semifinal against Emma Navarro when she was broken before serving for the match.

How she handles what will be a raucously pro-Pegula atmosphere on Saturday could be decisive, but she did it well against Navarro, going to the variety that she has incorporated into her game in recent months to get herself over the line.

Sabalenka leads the head-to-head against Pegula 5-2 and when they met in Cincinnati a few weeks ago, Sabalenka was a straight-sets winner. She’s also on a run of 11 straight match wins, dropping just one set in the process, and at Grand Slam level, Sabalenka has won 26 of her last 27 hard-court matches.

This is a surface that suits Pegula, too, as she pointed out in a press conference earlier this week. She comes into the match having won 15 of her 16 matches during the summer hard-court swing. Sabalenka has the greater weapons, so Pegula will need to use her athleticism to draw enough mistakes from her opponent and send her into the kind of mindset that can see her game unravel. She doesn’t let that happen so much now.

When the subject of her losing quarterfinal run was put to her, Pegula would often say that all she could do was keep putting herself in the position to win them and that is where Clijsters’ mind goes when recalling her Grand Slam history. The Belgian won three U.S. Open titles and four Grand Slam titles in total, despite all the nerves she felt before facing down Capriati in Paris. The act of winning a major title ultimately reps, she feels, just like any other aspect of tennis, whether that is winning a final or just being there to play one.

Kim Clijsters won the 2009 U.S. Open, four years after her first. She would go on to retain the title in 2010 (Emanuele Dunand / AFP via Getty Images)

“You can’t practice that on a practice court, it’s not like a serve out wide. Or a return,” she said.

“The only thing that can help you deal with it better is experience and to keep putting yourself in that position to get here again.”

Pegula can’t suddenly conjure up experience of matches like Saturday, but trusting that other opportunities may yet pop up even if she does lose could help her take the pressure off. Clijsters ultimately believes that losing her first final was the best way things could have panned out. The consequences of winning, though joyful, would have been too great to handle.

“I was almost too young for what that could mean,” she said.

“It would have been too quick. It would have gone too fast and would have been hard to deal with a lot of the consequences that come with it.”

Can Pegula handle the moment? Can Sabalenka handle the crowd? Come Saturday, they, and the rest of the tennis world, will find out.

(Top photos: Getty Images)